<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><default:channel xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" rdf:about="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/"><title>Eventual inevitability</title><link>http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en-EU</dc:language><admin:generatorAgent xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdf:resource="http://www.blog.co.uk"/><sy:updatePeriod xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">8</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2009/06/05/how-do-you-do-much-ado-6241855/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2008/10/12/ocurrences-during-recurrence-oftime-4859003/"/></rdf:Seq></items></default:channel><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2009/06/05/how-do-you-do-much-ado-6241855/"><default:title>How do you do - much ado</default:title><default:link>http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2009/06/05/how-do-you-do-much-ado-6241855/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2009-06-05T12:23:58+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Much ado about hardly anything at all&lt;br&gt;
(nothing  but existencial annihilism)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;This poem is based on literary extracts quoted from “The book of nothing” by John D. Barrow, combining previous quotes on nothing like nothing before&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;You ain’t seen nothing yet as zero stroke or cipher.&lt;br&gt;
Stroke is the name created by German physicians&lt;br&gt;
for a prevalent nervous malady brought about by decipher&lt;br&gt;
of the present fantastic currency figures by scores of clinicians.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Cases of the ‘stroke’ are reported among men in sands&lt;br&gt;
and women of all classes, who have been&lt;br&gt;
prostrated by their efforts to figure in thousands&lt;br&gt;
 and millions are any of these persons seen.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Apparently normal, except for a desire to write&lt;br&gt;
endless rows of ciphers is now art about drawing preface&lt;br&gt;
or about coloring in as nothing is closer to right&lt;br&gt;
supreme common place of our commonplace.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Age in its preoccupation with nothing forgot&lt;br&gt;
actually that nothing lending itself very poorly indeed brings&lt;br&gt;
to fantastic adornment since nothing is real, so is it not&lt;br&gt;
mysterious that we can know more about things.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Which do not exist about things which we do&lt;br&gt;
know exist in round numbers are always false in the free&lt;br&gt;
great mystery of zero that escaped even the hue&lt;br&gt;
when Joseph gathered corn as the sand of the sea.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Very much until he left numbering  for it was wick&lt;br&gt;
without number and in the same hour came forth finger lace&lt;br&gt;
of a man’s hand, and wrote against the candlestick&lt;br&gt;
upon the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;And this is the writing that was, Mene, as written in sand,&lt;br&gt;
Mene, Tekel, Upharsin. This is the interpretation.&lt;br&gt;
Mene; God hath numbered thy kingdom and&lt;br&gt;
finished it. Tekel; Thou art weighed in the balances: trepidation.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Art found wanting. Peres; thy kingdom is divided.&lt;br&gt;
I have nothing to say and am saying it and that is poetry sphere.&lt;br&gt;
The Indian zero stood for emptiness or absence, but also subsided&lt;br&gt;
space, the firmament, the celestial vault and the atmosphere.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Ether, as well as nothing, the quantity not to be taken&lt;br&gt;
 into account, the insignificant element. the stars shone&lt;br&gt;
forth, like zero dots scattered in the sky dot on her shaken&lt;br&gt;
forehead increasing her beauty tenfold, just as a zero dot throne.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Sunya-bindu increases a number tenfold. It is true that as eventful&lt;br&gt;
the empty voids and the dismal wilderness belong to zero,&lt;br&gt;
so the spirit of God and His light belong to the all-powerful&lt;br&gt;
One. Never let this thought prevail, that not being is, but throe.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Keep your mind away from this way of investigation. The clue&lt;br&gt;
to ingenious method of expressing every possible number&lt;br&gt;
is using a set of ten symbols (each symbol having a place value)&lt;br&gt;
that emerged in India. The idea seems so simple nowadays as slumber.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Its significance and profound importance is no longer&lt;br&gt;
appreciated. The importance of this invention is more&lt;br&gt;
readily appreciated when one considers that this is pronger&lt;br&gt;
beyond the two greatest men in antiquity, Archimedes score&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;and Appolonius.When after subtraction nothing is sly&lt;br&gt;
left over, they write the little circle, so that the place skewer&lt;br&gt;
does not remain empty. The little circle has to occupy&lt;br&gt;
the position, because otherwise there will be fewer &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;places, so that the second may be mistaken for the again&lt;br&gt;
first. Absolutely nothing at all the fool saith in his heart,&lt;br&gt;
that there is no empty set. But if they were so, then&lt;br&gt;
the set of all such sets would be empty and hence it depart.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Would be the empty set as lines, so loves oblique,&lt;br&gt;
may well themselves in every angle greet, but yours, irate,&lt;br&gt;
so truly parallel,though infinite, can never meet magnifique.&lt;br&gt;
The ultimate goal of mathematics is to eliminate &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;all need for intelligent though pure mathematics,&lt;br&gt;
consisting entirely of such asseverations as that,&lt;br&gt;
if such and such a proposition is true of anything pneumatics&lt;br&gt;
then such and such another proposition is true of scat.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;That thing is essential not to discuss whether&lt;br&gt;
the  first proposition is really true and not to mention&lt;br&gt;
what the anything is of which it is supposed to be true weather.&lt;br&gt;
If our hypothesis is about anything and not about tension&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Of some one or more particular things, then our deductions&lt;br&gt;
constitute mathematics. Thus mathematics may be slaying&lt;br&gt;
defined as the subject in which we never know what induction&lt;br&gt;
we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;It is true that you cannot have first space and then things to&lt;br&gt;
put into it, any more than you can first have a grin and probable,&lt;br&gt;
 then a Cheshire cat to fit into it. If an elderly, but true&lt;br&gt;
distinguished scientist says that something is possible &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;he is almost certainly right, but if he says that is impossible, reject.&lt;br&gt;
He is probably wrong. I love cosmology: there’s something&lt;br&gt;
uplifting about viewing the entire universe as a single object&lt;br&gt;
with a certain shape. What entity, short of God, could bring&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;nobler or worthier of a man’s attention than the cosmos repent&lt;br&gt;
itself?  Forget about interest rates, forget about war and aghad&lt;br&gt;
murder, let’s talk about space. There is an element&lt;br&gt;
of tragedy in the life-story of the ether. First we had &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;luminiferous ether. It’s freely given services as the wave&lt;br&gt;
theory of light and to the concept of field were of heathen&lt;br&gt;
 incalculable value to science. But after its charges slave&lt;br&gt;
had grown to man’s estate it was ruthlessly, even &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;joyfully, cast aside, its faith betrayed and its last days’ prairie&lt;br&gt;
embittered by ridicule and ignominy. Now that it is man&lt;br&gt;
gone it still remains unsung. This quantum theory&lt;br&gt;
reminds me a little of the system of delusions of an &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;exceedingly intelligent paranoic, concocted of wood:&lt;br&gt;
incoherent elements of thoughts. Anyone who is not touch-&lt;br&gt;
shocked by quantum theory has not  understood.&lt;br&gt;
The quantum theory gives me a feeling very much &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;like yours. One really ought to be ashamed of its brow&lt;br&gt;
in success, because it has been obtained in accordance&lt;br&gt;
with the Jesuit maxim: ‘Let not thy left hand know&lt;br&gt;
what thy right hand doeth’. The theory of quanta is abundance&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;similar to other victories in science; for some months score&lt;br&gt;
you smile at it and then for years you weep. God bawled.&lt;br&gt;
In the atoms is a superposition, if you like. Or&lt;br&gt;
whether you don’t like actually, that’s what it’s called. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;A superposition is like God in that the quantum object mind&lt;br&gt;
reminds occupying a number of different states simultaneously&lt;br&gt;
and can be everywhere at once. A superposition is a kind&lt;br&gt;
of immanence. Without these, quantum instantaneously&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;objects would simply crash into each other and solid&lt;br&gt;
matter could not possibly exist. The universe is merely frown&lt;br&gt;
on as fleeting idea in God’s mind – a pretty uncomfortable morbid&lt;br&gt;
thought, particularly if you’ve just made a down &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;payment on a house. I never predict anything and&lt;br&gt;
I never will do - it does not do to leave a dragon out&lt;br&gt;
of your calculations, if you live near him(most certainly) by hand.&lt;br&gt;
Since I have introduced this term I have always had a scout&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of bad conscience, but at that time I could see no other&lt;br&gt;
possibility to deal with the fact of the existence of would&lt;br&gt;
be finite mean density of matter. I found it very ugly smother&lt;br&gt;
indeed that the field force law of gravitation should &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;be composed of two logically independent terms&lt;br&gt;
which are connected by addition. About the justification&lt;br&gt;
of such feelings concerning logical simplicity it squirms&lt;br&gt;
difficult to argue. I cannot help to feel strongly renumeration&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;that I am unable to believe that such an ugly thing&lt;br&gt;
should be realized in nature, but we shall all be bangles&lt;br&gt;
changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye as cats spring&lt;br&gt;
no less liquid than their shadows, offering no angles &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;to the wind. They slip, diminished, neat, through&lt;br&gt;
loopholes, less than themselves. Every public action,&lt;br&gt;
which is not customary, either is wrong, or, if it is slew&lt;br&gt;
right, is a dangerous precedent. It follows that protraction&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of nothing should ever be done for the first time.&lt;br&gt;
I want to know why the universe exists, whence&lt;br&gt;
comes it, and how can it be understood that chime&lt;br&gt;
anything exists. Now, if I push these questions commence&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;aside and go straight to what hides behind them embodies&lt;br&gt;
this is what I find: Existence appears to me like&lt;br&gt;
a conquest over nought. If I ask myself why bodies&lt;br&gt;
or minds exist rather than nothing, I find no answer spike,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;but that a logical principle, such as A=A, should supernatural&lt;br&gt;
have the power of creating itself, triumphing overt&lt;br&gt;
the nought throughout  eternity, seeming to be natural.&lt;br&gt;
Suppose, then, that the principle on which all things inert&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;rest and which all things manifest, possesses a misery&lt;br&gt;
existence of the same nature as that of the definition&lt;br&gt;
of the circle, or as that of the axiom A=A: the mystery&lt;br&gt;
of existence vanishes. Getting real existence from pure rendition&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;logic is just too much of a conjuring trick. That sort of consonant&lt;br&gt;
that cannot contain rabbits. Purely coincidental squander -&lt;br&gt;
decide. Nothing doing - nothing  going with constant&lt;br&gt;
consistence. Slumber asunder in no formidable thunder &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;to  often wonder about nothing and do nothing small.&lt;br&gt;
The evolution of words for zero was said that all squalled&lt;br&gt;
Cambridge scholars call the cipher aught and all&lt;br&gt;
the Oxford scholars call it nought. The tenth is called &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;theca or circulus or figura nibili, because it stands&lt;br&gt;
 for nothing. Yet, when placed in its proper position&lt;br&gt;
it gives value to the others and of the ciphers understands&lt;br&gt;
there are but ten figures, of which nine are supposition&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of value and the tenth is worth nothing, but gives&lt;br&gt;
value to the others and is called zero or cipher.&lt;br&gt;
A place is nothing: not even space, unless at lives&lt;br&gt;
its heart – a figure stands. Among the great things decipher&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;which are found among us the existence of nothing-glory&lt;br&gt;
is the greatest. Nothing really matters. The library&lt;br&gt;
contains everything: the minutely detailed history&lt;br&gt;
of the future, the archangels’ auto-biographies contrary,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;the faithful catalogue of the library, thousands will&lt;br&gt;
and thousands of false catalogues, the demonstration&lt;br&gt;
of the fallacy of the true catalogue, the Gnostic gospel&lt;br&gt;
of Basilides,  the commentary on that gospel, the restoration,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;commentary on the commentary on that gospel scoff,&lt;br&gt;
the true story of your death, the translation of something,&lt;br&gt;
every book in all languages, the interpolations of&lt;br&gt;
every book in all books. Nothin’ ain’t worth nothing,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;but it’s free. A necessity I could not imagine swept&lt;br&gt;
over me: I had to try again and again to imagine begging&lt;br&gt;
the edge of space, or its edgelessness, time with adept&lt;br&gt;
a beginning and an end or time without a beginning &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;or end and both were equally impossible, equally&lt;br&gt;
hopeless. Under an irresistible compulsion I brought&lt;br&gt;
from one to the other, at times so closely threatened freely&lt;br&gt;
with the danger of madness that I seriously thought &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of avoiding it by suicide. Nothingness haunts being.&lt;br&gt;
That means that being has no need of nothingness&lt;br&gt;
in order to be conceived and that we can examine seeing&lt;br&gt;
the idea of it exhaustively without finding there arbitrariness-&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;the least trace of nothingness. But on the other hand,&lt;br&gt;
nothingness, which is not, can only have a borrow&lt;br&gt;
existence and it gets its beings from being. Its band&lt;br&gt;
nothingness of being is encountered only within sorrow&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;for the limits of being and the total disappearance instant&lt;br&gt;
of being would not be the advent of the reign of persists&lt;br&gt;
to non-being, but on the contrary the concomitant&lt;br&gt;
disappearance of nothingness. Non-being exists &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;only on the surface of being. For Aristotle, engaged&lt;br&gt;
in classifying, ordering and analyzing the world into identifiable&lt;br&gt;
 in its irreducible and final categories, objects, causes disengaged&lt;br&gt;
and attributes, the prospect of an unclassifiable&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt; emptiness and attributeless hole in the natural commences&lt;br&gt;
fabric of being, isolated from cause and effect&lt;br&gt;
and detached from what was palpable to the senses,&lt;br&gt;
must  have presented itself as a dangerous sickness detect.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;God-denying madness left him with an noting&lt;br&gt;
 ineradicable horror vacui. Zeno’s paradoxes&lt;br&gt;
of motion: There can be no motion, because anything&lt;br&gt;
that moves must reach the half-way point of its oxen or ox’s &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;journey before it reached the end. So to  cover ozen&lt;br&gt;
on metre of the race course, you must first cover ozone&lt;br&gt;
half a metre, before the one eight, and so on forever dozen.&lt;br&gt;
 How is it possible to reach an infinite number of nogo-zone&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;positions in a finite time? Achilles can run 400 metres&lt;br&gt;
in a minute  while a turtle can run 40 metres a minute.&lt;br&gt;
The turtle starts 400 metres ahead of Achilles creatures.&lt;br&gt;
 Achilles can never overtake the turtle, because innately in it&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;after Achilles has run 400 metres the turtle is still&lt;br&gt;
40 metres ahead of him. By the time Achilles has by ton&lt;br&gt;
covered these 40 metres in a tenth of a minute as frill&lt;br&gt;
the turtle is still 4 metres ahead of him, and so on, &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;forever, well, talk about an unfair advantage by morn.&lt;br&gt;
Beginning of belief in ether: Why does magnetic animations&lt;br&gt;
attract iron? Empedocles says that the iron is drawn&lt;br&gt;
 to the magnet, because both give off amanations &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;and because the size of the pores in the magnetic reproach&lt;br&gt;
corresponds to the emanations of the iron. Thus,&lt;br&gt;
 whenever the emanations of the iron approach&lt;br&gt;
the pores of the magnet and fit them in shaped discuss&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;the iron is drawn after the  emanations and is mispaced&lt;br&gt;
as attracted. When a girl, playing with the water displaced&lt;br&gt;
catcher of shining brass when, having placed&lt;br&gt;
the mouth of the pipe on her well-shaped hand replaced,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;she dips the vessel into the yielding substance&lt;br&gt;
of silvery water, still the volume of air pressing insistence&lt;br&gt;
from inside on the many holes keeps out the water instance&lt;br&gt;
until she discovers the condensed stream of air subsistence.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Then at once when the air flows out, the water&lt;br&gt;
flows in an equal quantity. Unless there is a void&lt;br&gt;
with a spatial being of its own, what is cannot quarter&lt;br&gt;
be moved nor again can it be many, since there devoid&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt; is nothing to keep things apart. Although all the tall&lt;br&gt;
 atoms are in motion, their totality appears to stand by far&lt;br&gt;
totally motionless. This is because the atoms of all&lt;br&gt;
lie far below the range of our senses. Since their bizarre &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;selves are invisible, their movements also must&lt;br&gt;
elude observation. Indeed, even visible objects,&lt;br&gt;
when set at a distance, often disguise their movement’s thrust.&lt;br&gt;
Often on a hillside fleecy sheep, as they crop their rejects&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of lush pasture, creep slowly onward, lured this way to fret&lt;br&gt;
or that by grass that sparkles with fresh dew, while stir&lt;br&gt;
the full-fed lambs gaily, frisk and butt. And yet,&lt;br&gt;
when we gaze from a distance we see only a  blur – &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;a white patch stationary on the green hillside.&lt;br&gt;
Void exists. It is the void which keeps things distinct,&lt;br&gt;
being a kind of separation and division of  things divide.&lt;br&gt;
This is true first and foremost of numbers; for the instinct&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;To void keeps them distinct. Humility collects the soul tired&lt;br&gt;
into a single point by the power of silence. A truly&lt;br&gt;
humble man has no desire to be known or admired&lt;br&gt;
by others, but wishes to form himself into himself fewly.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;He is completely with God. Miracles are explainable;&lt;br&gt;
it is the explanations that are miraculous. But if there&lt;br&gt;
is a void above and a void below, a void within and attainable&lt;br&gt;
void without, he  who is intent on escaping  void has scare&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt; need of a certain imaginative mobility. If two bodies&lt;br&gt;
suddenly spring apart from contact on a broad surface gushes,&lt;br&gt;
all the intervening space must be void until it disembodies&lt;br&gt;
occupied by air. However quickly the air rushes &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;in all round, the entire space cannot be filled to race&lt;br&gt;
instantaneously. The air must occupy after one spot&lt;br&gt;
another until it has taken possession of the whole space.&lt;br&gt;
We are not to consider the world as the body of God, forgot,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;or the several parts thereof, as the body of God, unlike elves&lt;br&gt;
is a uniform being, void of organs, members or parts&lt;br&gt;
being everywhere present to the things themselves.&lt;br&gt;
And since space is divisible in infinitum, and matter is departs&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;not necessarily in all places, it may also be allowed&lt;br&gt;
that God is able to create particles of matter of several&lt;br&gt;
sizes and figures and in several proportions to space disallowed&lt;br&gt;
and perhaps of different densities and forces and  reprieval&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;thereby to vary the laws of Nature and make worlds that&lt;br&gt;
of several sorts in several parts of the Universe. At&lt;br&gt;
 least I see nothing of contradiction in this. What&lt;br&gt;
if the space the is empty bodies is filled with were scat&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;engaged in an operation at once imative and discarded&lt;br&gt;
as blasphemous, at once sacred and profane, since&lt;br&gt;
the formal paradox, conventionally regarded&lt;br&gt;
as low, parodies at the same time as is imitated convince&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;in the divine act of Creation. And yet who can see&lt;br&gt;
to accuse the paradoxist of blasphemy, really? Since&lt;br&gt;
his subject is nothing , he cannot be said to be&lt;br&gt;
impious in taking the Creator’s prerogative as his omnipotence.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;For nothing, as all the men know can come post&lt;br&gt;
of nothing. Nor indeed is he directing men to impotent&lt;br&gt;
dangerous speculation, since at the very most&lt;br&gt;
he beguiles them into nothing. And most important &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of all of the paradoxist lies, he  does not lie, since he&lt;br&gt;
lies about nothing. The prayse of nothing has nothing quiver&lt;br&gt;
first, and shall be last for nothing holds for ever and glee&lt;br&gt;
nothing ever yet scap’t death, so can’t the longest liver:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;nothing’s so immortall, nothing can, from crosses ever&lt;br&gt;
keepe a man, nothing can live, when the world is gone,&lt;br&gt;
for all shall come to nothing. Nothing is richer than never&lt;br&gt;
precious stones and than gold; Nothing is  finer than one&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;adamant; nothing nobler than the blood of king’s articulation,&lt;br&gt;
nothing is sacred in wars; nothing is greater than abject&lt;br&gt;
referral to Socrates’ wisdom – indeed, by his own affirmation,&lt;br&gt;
nothing is Socrates’ wisdom. Nothing is the subject &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;of the speculations of the great zero; nothing is higher&lt;br&gt;
than the heaven; nothing is beyond the walls of the got&lt;br&gt;
world; nothing is lower than hell, or more glorious desire&lt;br&gt;
than virtue. Is this nothing? Nothingness is not, &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Nothingness is ‘made-to-be’, Nothingness does not brevity&lt;br&gt;
nihilate itself; nothingness ‘is nihilated. It would be akwardness&lt;br&gt;
inconceivable that a being which is full positivity&lt;br&gt;
would maintain and create outside itself a nothingness &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;or transcendent being, for there would be nothing in trust&lt;br&gt;
being by which being would surpass itself into non-being.&lt;br&gt;
The being by which nothingness arrives in the world must&lt;br&gt;
 nihilate nothingness in its being, and even so it still runs seeing.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The risk of establishing nothingness as a transcendent&lt;br&gt;
in the very heart of immanence unless if nihilates&lt;br&gt;
has nothingness in connection with its own being prescedent&lt;br&gt;
by which nothingness arrives in the  world is a being aniihilates&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;such that in its being, the nothingness of its being is trueman&lt;br&gt;
in question. The being by which nothingness comes abjectly&lt;br&gt;
to the world must be its own nothingness. The human&lt;br&gt;
intellect does understand some proportions perfectly&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;and thus in these it has as much absolute certainty as&lt;br&gt;
 nature itself has. Of such are the mathematical sciences&lt;br&gt;
alone; that is, geometry and arithmetic, in which has&lt;br&gt;
Divine intellect indeed knows infinitely more proportioned preferences&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;since it knows them all. But with regard to those few&lt;br&gt;
which the human intellect does not understand, I believe&lt;br&gt;
that its knowledge  equals the divine in objective certainty that blew&lt;br&gt;
on the empty desk as sat an empty glass of milk. Notice how receive&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;in absence of full stop accentuates concept of  continuity&lt;br&gt;
 into infinity ad infinitum.To delve into the manifold&lt;br&gt;
mysteries of nature is the task of an enquiring an fertile ambiguity&lt;br&gt;
in mind. O, follow the tortuous paths of nature’s wondrous manyfold.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Way is work more difficult and not designed for everyone sing.&lt;br&gt;
Everything is in nothing and if God should reduce&lt;br&gt;
the fabric of the world, which he created into nothing, nothing&lt;br&gt;
would remain of its place other than nothing just as it was deduce&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;before the creation of the world, that is, the uncreated.&lt;br&gt;
For the uncreated is that whose beginning does not bore&lt;br&gt;
pre-exist and nothing, we say, is that whose beginning imitated&lt;br&gt;
that what does not pre-exist. Nothing contains all things. It is more &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;precious than gold, without beginning and end, more joyous&lt;br&gt;
than the perception of bountiful light, more noble than the obsessed&lt;br&gt;
blood of kings, comparable to the heavens, higher than the insiduous&lt;br&gt;
stars, comparable to a stroke of lightning, perfect and blessed &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;in every way. Nothing always inspires. Where nothing is, there clover&lt;br&gt;
ceases the jurisdiction of all kings. Nothing is without any prayer&lt;br&gt;
for mischief. According to Job, the Earth is suspended over&lt;br&gt;
nothing. Nothing is outside the world. Nothing is everywhere. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;They say the vacuum is nothing and they say that imaginary space&lt;br&gt;
and space itself is nothing. The idea of an omnipresent medium fright&lt;br&gt;
has considerable attractions for the scientist. It enables him trace&lt;br&gt;
for example, to explain how such familiar phenomena as light, &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;heat, sound and magnetism can operate over great distances&lt;br&gt;
and travel through a seemingly empty space. Nothing is enough&lt;br&gt;
for a man to whom enough is too little. It is inconceivable, that instances&lt;br&gt;
inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of rough,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;something else, which is not material, operate upon&lt;br&gt;
and affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must deterrent&lt;br&gt;
do if gravitation, in the sense of Epicurus be essential and on&lt;br&gt;
inherent in it that gravity should be innate, inherent &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;and essential to the matter, so that on body may act upon of course&lt;br&gt;
another as a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation&lt;br&gt;
of anything else, by and through which their action and force&lt;br&gt;
may be conveyed from one to another, it is to me so  great repudiation&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical affording&lt;br&gt;
matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it material&lt;br&gt;
gravity thatmust be caused by an agent acting constantly according&lt;br&gt;
to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial,&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt; I have left to the consideration of my readers. Medium missiles&lt;br&gt;
exceedingly more rare and elastic than air and by consequence&lt;br&gt;
 exceedingly less able to resist the motion of projectiles,&lt;br&gt;
and exceedingly more able to press upon gross bodies’ innocence&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;by endeavouring to expand itself has been argued by splattered&lt;br&gt;
astronomers that the number of the stars must be limited,&lt;br&gt;
or on the supposition of an infinite number uniformly scattered&lt;br&gt;
 through space, it would follow that the whole heavens would inhibited&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;shine with a uniform light, probably equal to that of the sun.&lt;br&gt;
We may considerthe reflecting vacuum as forming the internal&lt;br&gt;
surface of a hollow sphere. Now the sirens have a still more stun&lt;br&gt;
fatal weapon than their song, namely silencse of someone ephemereal&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;that might possibly  have escaped from their singing;&lt;br&gt;
but from their silence never bringing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2009/06/05/how-do-you-do-much-ado-6241855/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Much ado about hardly anything at all<br>
(nothing  but existencial annihilism)</p>
	<p>This poem is based on literary extracts quoted from “The book of nothing” by John D. Barrow, combining previous quotes on nothing like nothing before</p>
	<p>You ain’t seen nothing yet as zero stroke or cipher.<br>
Stroke is the name created by German physicians<br>
for a prevalent nervous malady brought about by decipher<br>
of the present fantastic currency figures by scores of clinicians.</p>
	<p>Cases of the ‘stroke’ are reported among men in sands<br>
and women of all classes, who have been<br>
prostrated by their efforts to figure in thousands<br>
 and millions are any of these persons seen.</p>
	<p>Apparently normal, except for a desire to write<br>
endless rows of ciphers is now art about drawing preface<br>
or about coloring in as nothing is closer to right<br>
supreme common place of our commonplace.</p>
	<p>Age in its preoccupation with nothing forgot<br>
actually that nothing lending itself very poorly indeed brings<br>
to fantastic adornment since nothing is real, so is it not<br>
mysterious that we can know more about things.</p>
	<p>Which do not exist about things which we do<br>
know exist in round numbers are always false in the free<br>
great mystery of zero that escaped even the hue<br>
when Joseph gathered corn as the sand of the sea.</p>
	<p>Very much until he left numbering  for it was wick<br>
without number and in the same hour came forth finger lace<br>
of a man’s hand, and wrote against the candlestick<br>
upon the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace.</p>
	<p>And this is the writing that was, Mene, as written in sand,<br>
Mene, Tekel, Upharsin. This is the interpretation.<br>
Mene; God hath numbered thy kingdom and<br>
finished it. Tekel; Thou art weighed in the balances: trepidation.</p>
	<p>Art found wanting. Peres; thy kingdom is divided.<br>
I have nothing to say and am saying it and that is poetry sphere.<br>
The Indian zero stood for emptiness or absence, but also subsided<br>
space, the firmament, the celestial vault and the atmosphere.</p>
	<p>Ether, as well as nothing, the quantity not to be taken<br>
 into account, the insignificant element. the stars shone<br>
forth, like zero dots scattered in the sky dot on her shaken<br>
forehead increasing her beauty tenfold, just as a zero dot throne.</p>
	<p>Sunya-bindu increases a number tenfold. It is true that as eventful<br>
the empty voids and the dismal wilderness belong to zero,<br>
so the spirit of God and His light belong to the all-powerful<br>
One. Never let this thought prevail, that not being is, but throe.</p>
	<p>Keep your mind away from this way of investigation. The clue<br>
to ingenious method of expressing every possible number<br>
is using a set of ten symbols (each symbol having a place value)<br>
that emerged in India. The idea seems so simple nowadays as slumber.</p>
	<p>Its significance and profound importance is no longer<br>
appreciated. The importance of this invention is more<br>
readily appreciated when one considers that this is pronger<br>
beyond the two greatest men in antiquity, Archimedes score</p>
	<p>and Appolonius.When after subtraction nothing is sly<br>
left over, they write the little circle, so that the place skewer<br>
does not remain empty. The little circle has to occupy<br>
the position, because otherwise there will be fewer </p>
	<p>places, so that the second may be mistaken for the again<br>
first. Absolutely nothing at all the fool saith in his heart,<br>
that there is no empty set. But if they were so, then<br>
the set of all such sets would be empty and hence it depart.</p>
	<p>Would be the empty set as lines, so loves oblique,<br>
may well themselves in every angle greet, but yours, irate,<br>
so truly parallel,though infinite, can never meet magnifique.<br>
The ultimate goal of mathematics is to eliminate </p>
	<p>all need for intelligent though pure mathematics,<br>
consisting entirely of such asseverations as that,<br>
if such and such a proposition is true of anything pneumatics<br>
then such and such another proposition is true of scat.</p>
	<p>That thing is essential not to discuss whether<br>
the  first proposition is really true and not to mention<br>
what the anything is of which it is supposed to be true weather.<br>
If our hypothesis is about anything and not about tension</p>
	<p>Of some one or more particular things, then our deductions<br>
constitute mathematics. Thus mathematics may be slaying<br>
defined as the subject in which we never know what induction<br>
we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying.</p>
	<p>It is true that you cannot have first space and then things to<br>
put into it, any more than you can first have a grin and probable,<br>
 then a Cheshire cat to fit into it. If an elderly, but true<br>
distinguished scientist says that something is possible </p>
	<p>he is almost certainly right, but if he says that is impossible, reject.<br>
He is probably wrong. I love cosmology: there’s something<br>
uplifting about viewing the entire universe as a single object<br>
with a certain shape. What entity, short of God, could bring</p>
	<p>nobler or worthier of a man’s attention than the cosmos repent<br>
itself?  Forget about interest rates, forget about war and aghad<br>
murder, let’s talk about space. There is an element<br>
of tragedy in the life-story of the ether. First we had </p>
	<p>luminiferous ether. It’s freely given services as the wave<br>
theory of light and to the concept of field were of heathen<br>
 incalculable value to science. But after its charges slave<br>
had grown to man’s estate it was ruthlessly, even </p>
	<p>joyfully, cast aside, its faith betrayed and its last days’ prairie<br>
embittered by ridicule and ignominy. Now that it is man<br>
gone it still remains unsung. This quantum theory<br>
reminds me a little of the system of delusions of an </p>
	<p>exceedingly intelligent paranoic, concocted of wood:<br>
incoherent elements of thoughts. Anyone who is not touch-<br>
shocked by quantum theory has not  understood.<br>
The quantum theory gives me a feeling very much </p>
	<p>like yours. One really ought to be ashamed of its brow<br>
in success, because it has been obtained in accordance<br>
with the Jesuit maxim: ‘Let not thy left hand know<br>
what thy right hand doeth’. The theory of quanta is abundance</p>
	<p>similar to other victories in science; for some months score<br>
you smile at it and then for years you weep. God bawled.<br>
In the atoms is a superposition, if you like. Or<br>
whether you don’t like actually, that’s what it’s called. </p>
	<p>A superposition is like God in that the quantum object mind<br>
reminds occupying a number of different states simultaneously<br>
and can be everywhere at once. A superposition is a kind<br>
of immanence. Without these, quantum instantaneously</p>
	<p>objects would simply crash into each other and solid<br>
matter could not possibly exist. The universe is merely frown<br>
on as fleeting idea in God’s mind – a pretty uncomfortable morbid<br>
thought, particularly if you’ve just made a down </p>
	<p>payment on a house. I never predict anything and<br>
I never will do - it does not do to leave a dragon out<br>
of your calculations, if you live near him(most certainly) by hand.<br>
Since I have introduced this term I have always had a scout</p>
	<p>of bad conscience, but at that time I could see no other<br>
possibility to deal with the fact of the existence of would<br>
be finite mean density of matter. I found it very ugly smother<br>
indeed that the field force law of gravitation should </p>
	<p>be composed of two logically independent terms<br>
which are connected by addition. About the justification<br>
of such feelings concerning logical simplicity it squirms<br>
difficult to argue. I cannot help to feel strongly renumeration</p>
	<p>that I am unable to believe that such an ugly thing<br>
should be realized in nature, but we shall all be bangles<br>
changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye as cats spring<br>
no less liquid than their shadows, offering no angles </p>
	<p>to the wind. They slip, diminished, neat, through<br>
loopholes, less than themselves. Every public action,<br>
which is not customary, either is wrong, or, if it is slew<br>
right, is a dangerous precedent. It follows that protraction</p>
	<p>of nothing should ever be done for the first time.<br>
I want to know why the universe exists, whence<br>
comes it, and how can it be understood that chime<br>
anything exists. Now, if I push these questions commence</p>
	<p>aside and go straight to what hides behind them embodies<br>
this is what I find: Existence appears to me like<br>
a conquest over nought. If I ask myself why bodies<br>
or minds exist rather than nothing, I find no answer spike,</p>
	<p>but that a logical principle, such as A=A, should supernatural<br>
have the power of creating itself, triumphing overt<br>
the nought throughout  eternity, seeming to be natural.<br>
Suppose, then, that the principle on which all things inert</p>
	<p>rest and which all things manifest, possesses a misery<br>
existence of the same nature as that of the definition<br>
of the circle, or as that of the axiom A=A: the mystery<br>
of existence vanishes. Getting real existence from pure rendition</p>
	<p>logic is just too much of a conjuring trick. That sort of consonant<br>
that cannot contain rabbits. Purely coincidental squander -<br>
decide. Nothing doing - nothing  going with constant<br>
consistence. Slumber asunder in no formidable thunder </p>
	<p>to  often wonder about nothing and do nothing small.<br>
The evolution of words for zero was said that all squalled<br>
Cambridge scholars call the cipher aught and all<br>
the Oxford scholars call it nought. The tenth is called </p>
	<p>theca or circulus or figura nibili, because it stands<br>
 for nothing. Yet, when placed in its proper position<br>
it gives value to the others and of the ciphers understands<br>
there are but ten figures, of which nine are supposition</p>
	<p>of value and the tenth is worth nothing, but gives<br>
value to the others and is called zero or cipher.<br>
A place is nothing: not even space, unless at lives<br>
its heart – a figure stands. Among the great things decipher</p>
	<p>which are found among us the existence of nothing-glory<br>
is the greatest. Nothing really matters. The library<br>
contains everything: the minutely detailed history<br>
of the future, the archangels’ auto-biographies contrary,</p>
	<p>the faithful catalogue of the library, thousands will<br>
and thousands of false catalogues, the demonstration<br>
of the fallacy of the true catalogue, the Gnostic gospel<br>
of Basilides,  the commentary on that gospel, the restoration,</p>
	<p>commentary on the commentary on that gospel scoff,<br>
the true story of your death, the translation of something,<br>
every book in all languages, the interpolations of<br>
every book in all books. Nothin’ ain’t worth nothing,</p>
	<p>but it’s free. A necessity I could not imagine swept<br>
over me: I had to try again and again to imagine begging<br>
the edge of space, or its edgelessness, time with adept<br>
a beginning and an end or time without a beginning </p>
	<p>or end and both were equally impossible, equally<br>
hopeless. Under an irresistible compulsion I brought<br>
from one to the other, at times so closely threatened freely<br>
with the danger of madness that I seriously thought </p>
	<p>of avoiding it by suicide. Nothingness haunts being.<br>
That means that being has no need of nothingness<br>
in order to be conceived and that we can examine seeing<br>
the idea of it exhaustively without finding there arbitrariness-</p>
	<p>the least trace of nothingness. But on the other hand,<br>
nothingness, which is not, can only have a borrow<br>
existence and it gets its beings from being. Its band<br>
nothingness of being is encountered only within sorrow</p>
	<p>for the limits of being and the total disappearance instant<br>
of being would not be the advent of the reign of persists<br>
to non-being, but on the contrary the concomitant<br>
disappearance of nothingness. Non-being exists </p>
	<p>only on the surface of being. For Aristotle, engaged<br>
in classifying, ordering and analyzing the world into identifiable<br>
 in its irreducible and final categories, objects, causes disengaged<br>
and attributes, the prospect of an unclassifiable</p>
	<p> emptiness and attributeless hole in the natural commences<br>
fabric of being, isolated from cause and effect<br>
and detached from what was palpable to the senses,<br>
must  have presented itself as a dangerous sickness detect.</p>
	<p>God-denying madness left him with an noting<br>
 ineradicable horror vacui. Zeno’s paradoxes<br>
of motion: There can be no motion, because anything<br>
that moves must reach the half-way point of its oxen or ox’s </p>
	<p>journey before it reached the end. So to  cover ozen<br>
on metre of the race course, you must first cover ozone<br>
half a metre, before the one eight, and so on forever dozen.<br>
 How is it possible to reach an infinite number of nogo-zone</p>
	<p>positions in a finite time? Achilles can run 400 metres<br>
in a minute  while a turtle can run 40 metres a minute.<br>
The turtle starts 400 metres ahead of Achilles creatures.<br>
 Achilles can never overtake the turtle, because innately in it</p>
	<p>after Achilles has run 400 metres the turtle is still<br>
40 metres ahead of him. By the time Achilles has by ton<br>
covered these 40 metres in a tenth of a minute as frill<br>
the turtle is still 4 metres ahead of him, and so on, </p>
	<p>forever, well, talk about an unfair advantage by morn.<br>
Beginning of belief in ether: Why does magnetic animations<br>
attract iron? Empedocles says that the iron is drawn<br>
 to the magnet, because both give off amanations </p>
	<p>and because the size of the pores in the magnetic reproach<br>
corresponds to the emanations of the iron. Thus,<br>
 whenever the emanations of the iron approach<br>
the pores of the magnet and fit them in shaped discuss</p>
	<p>the iron is drawn after the  emanations and is mispaced<br>
as attracted. When a girl, playing with the water displaced<br>
catcher of shining brass when, having placed<br>
the mouth of the pipe on her well-shaped hand replaced,</p>
	<p>she dips the vessel into the yielding substance<br>
of silvery water, still the volume of air pressing insistence<br>
from inside on the many holes keeps out the water instance<br>
until she discovers the condensed stream of air subsistence.</p>
	<p>Then at once when the air flows out, the water<br>
flows in an equal quantity. Unless there is a void<br>
with a spatial being of its own, what is cannot quarter<br>
be moved nor again can it be many, since there devoid</p>
	<p> is nothing to keep things apart. Although all the tall<br>
 atoms are in motion, their totality appears to stand by far<br>
totally motionless. This is because the atoms of all<br>
lie far below the range of our senses. Since their bizarre </p>
	<p>selves are invisible, their movements also must<br>
elude observation. Indeed, even visible objects,<br>
when set at a distance, often disguise their movement’s thrust.<br>
Often on a hillside fleecy sheep, as they crop their rejects</p>
	<p>of lush pasture, creep slowly onward, lured this way to fret<br>
or that by grass that sparkles with fresh dew, while stir<br>
the full-fed lambs gaily, frisk and butt. And yet,<br>
when we gaze from a distance we see only a  blur – </p>
	<p>a white patch stationary on the green hillside.<br>
Void exists. It is the void which keeps things distinct,<br>
being a kind of separation and division of  things divide.<br>
This is true first and foremost of numbers; for the instinct</p>
	<p>To void keeps them distinct. Humility collects the soul tired<br>
into a single point by the power of silence. A truly<br>
humble man has no desire to be known or admired<br>
by others, but wishes to form himself into himself fewly.</p>
	<p>He is completely with God. Miracles are explainable;<br>
it is the explanations that are miraculous. But if there<br>
is a void above and a void below, a void within and attainable<br>
void without, he  who is intent on escaping  void has scare</p>
	<p> need of a certain imaginative mobility. If two bodies<br>
suddenly spring apart from contact on a broad surface gushes,<br>
all the intervening space must be void until it disembodies<br>
occupied by air. However quickly the air rushes </p>
	<p>in all round, the entire space cannot be filled to race<br>
instantaneously. The air must occupy after one spot<br>
another until it has taken possession of the whole space.<br>
We are not to consider the world as the body of God, forgot,</p>
	<p>or the several parts thereof, as the body of God, unlike elves<br>
is a uniform being, void of organs, members or parts<br>
being everywhere present to the things themselves.<br>
And since space is divisible in infinitum, and matter is departs</p>
	<p>not necessarily in all places, it may also be allowed<br>
that God is able to create particles of matter of several<br>
sizes and figures and in several proportions to space disallowed<br>
and perhaps of different densities and forces and  reprieval</p>
	<p>thereby to vary the laws of Nature and make worlds that<br>
of several sorts in several parts of the Universe. At<br>
 least I see nothing of contradiction in this. What<br>
if the space the is empty bodies is filled with were scat</p>
	<p>engaged in an operation at once imative and discarded<br>
as blasphemous, at once sacred and profane, since<br>
the formal paradox, conventionally regarded<br>
as low, parodies at the same time as is imitated convince</p>
	<p>in the divine act of Creation. And yet who can see<br>
to accuse the paradoxist of blasphemy, really? Since<br>
his subject is nothing , he cannot be said to be<br>
impious in taking the Creator’s prerogative as his omnipotence.</p>
	<p>For nothing, as all the men know can come post<br>
of nothing. Nor indeed is he directing men to impotent<br>
dangerous speculation, since at the very most<br>
he beguiles them into nothing. And most important </p>
	<p>of all of the paradoxist lies, he  does not lie, since he<br>
lies about nothing. The prayse of nothing has nothing quiver<br>
first, and shall be last for nothing holds for ever and glee<br>
nothing ever yet scap’t death, so can’t the longest liver:</p>
	<p>nothing’s so immortall, nothing can, from crosses ever<br>
keepe a man, nothing can live, when the world is gone,<br>
for all shall come to nothing. Nothing is richer than never<br>
precious stones and than gold; Nothing is  finer than one</p>
	<p>adamant; nothing nobler than the blood of king’s articulation,<br>
nothing is sacred in wars; nothing is greater than abject<br>
referral to Socrates’ wisdom – indeed, by his own affirmation,<br>
nothing is Socrates’ wisdom. Nothing is the subject </p>
	<p>of the speculations of the great zero; nothing is higher<br>
than the heaven; nothing is beyond the walls of the got<br>
world; nothing is lower than hell, or more glorious desire<br>
than virtue. Is this nothing? Nothingness is not, </p>
	<p>Nothingness is ‘made-to-be’, Nothingness does not brevity<br>
nihilate itself; nothingness ‘is nihilated. It would be akwardness<br>
inconceivable that a being which is full positivity<br>
would maintain and create outside itself a nothingness </p>
	<p>or transcendent being, for there would be nothing in trust<br>
being by which being would surpass itself into non-being.<br>
The being by which nothingness arrives in the world must<br>
 nihilate nothingness in its being, and even so it still runs seeing.</p>
	<p>The risk of establishing nothingness as a transcendent<br>
in the very heart of immanence unless if nihilates<br>
has nothingness in connection with its own being prescedent<br>
by which nothingness arrives in the  world is a being aniihilates</p>
	<p>such that in its being, the nothingness of its being is trueman<br>
in question. The being by which nothingness comes abjectly<br>
to the world must be its own nothingness. The human<br>
intellect does understand some proportions perfectly</p>
	<p>and thus in these it has as much absolute certainty as<br>
 nature itself has. Of such are the mathematical sciences<br>
alone; that is, geometry and arithmetic, in which has<br>
Divine intellect indeed knows infinitely more proportioned preferences</p>
	<p>since it knows them all. But with regard to those few<br>
which the human intellect does not understand, I believe<br>
that its knowledge  equals the divine in objective certainty that blew<br>
on the empty desk as sat an empty glass of milk. Notice how receive</p>
	<p>in absence of full stop accentuates concept of  continuity<br>
 into infinity ad infinitum.To delve into the manifold<br>
mysteries of nature is the task of an enquiring an fertile ambiguity<br>
in mind. O, follow the tortuous paths of nature’s wondrous manyfold.</p>
	<p>Way is work more difficult and not designed for everyone sing.<br>
Everything is in nothing and if God should reduce<br>
the fabric of the world, which he created into nothing, nothing<br>
would remain of its place other than nothing just as it was deduce</p>
	<p>before the creation of the world, that is, the uncreated.<br>
For the uncreated is that whose beginning does not bore<br>
pre-exist and nothing, we say, is that whose beginning imitated<br>
that what does not pre-exist. Nothing contains all things. It is more </p>
	<p>precious than gold, without beginning and end, more joyous<br>
than the perception of bountiful light, more noble than the obsessed<br>
blood of kings, comparable to the heavens, higher than the insiduous<br>
stars, comparable to a stroke of lightning, perfect and blessed </p>
	<p>in every way. Nothing always inspires. Where nothing is, there clover<br>
ceases the jurisdiction of all kings. Nothing is without any prayer<br>
for mischief. According to Job, the Earth is suspended over<br>
nothing. Nothing is outside the world. Nothing is everywhere. </p>
	<p>They say the vacuum is nothing and they say that imaginary space<br>
and space itself is nothing. The idea of an omnipresent medium fright<br>
has considerable attractions for the scientist. It enables him trace<br>
for example, to explain how such familiar phenomena as light, </p>
	<p>heat, sound and magnetism can operate over great distances<br>
and travel through a seemingly empty space. Nothing is enough<br>
for a man to whom enough is too little. It is inconceivable, that instances<br>
inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of rough,</p>
	<p>something else, which is not material, operate upon<br>
and affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must deterrent<br>
do if gravitation, in the sense of Epicurus be essential and on<br>
inherent in it that gravity should be innate, inherent </p>
	<p>and essential to the matter, so that on body may act upon of course<br>
another as a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation<br>
of anything else, by and through which their action and force<br>
may be conveyed from one to another, it is to me so  great repudiation</p>
	<p>an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical affording<br>
matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it material<br>
gravity thatmust be caused by an agent acting constantly according<br>
to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial,</p>
	<p> I have left to the consideration of my readers. Medium missiles<br>
exceedingly more rare and elastic than air and by consequence<br>
 exceedingly less able to resist the motion of projectiles,<br>
and exceedingly more able to press upon gross bodies’ innocence</p>
	<p>by endeavouring to expand itself has been argued by splattered<br>
astronomers that the number of the stars must be limited,<br>
or on the supposition of an infinite number uniformly scattered<br>
 through space, it would follow that the whole heavens would inhibited</p>
	<p>shine with a uniform light, probably equal to that of the sun.<br>
We may considerthe reflecting vacuum as forming the internal<br>
surface of a hollow sphere. Now the sirens have a still more stun<br>
fatal weapon than their song, namely silencse of someone ephemereal</p>
	<p>that might possibly  have escaped from their singing;<br>
but from their silence never bringing.</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2009/06/05/how-do-you-do-much-ado-6241855/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2008/10/12/ocurrences-during-recurrence-oftime-4859003/"><default:title>Ocurrences during recurrence of time</default:title><default:link>http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2008/10/12/ocurrences-during-recurrence-oftime-4859003/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2008-10-12T14:24:38+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldtimeserver.com/clocks/wtsclock024.swf?color=FF9900&amp;wtsid=US-NY"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2008/10/12/ocurrences-during-recurrence-oftime-4859003/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.worldtimeserver.com/clocks/wtsclock024.swf?color=FF9900&wtsid=US-NY"></a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://eventualinevitability.blog.co.uk/2008/10/12/ocurrences-during-recurrence-oftime-4859003/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item></rdf:RDF>
