• How do you do - much ado

    Much ado about hardly anything at all
    (nothing but existencial annihilism)

    This poem is based on literary extracts quoted from “The book of nothing” by John D. Barrow, combining previous quotes on nothing like nothing before

    You ain’t seen nothing yet as zero stroke or cipher.
    Stroke is the name created by German physicians
    for a prevalent nervous malady brought about by decipher
    of the present fantastic currency figures by scores of clinicians.

    Cases of the ‘stroke’ are reported among men in sands
    and women of all classes, who have been
    prostrated by their efforts to figure in thousands
    and millions are any of these persons seen.

    Apparently normal, except for a desire to write
    endless rows of ciphers is now art about drawing preface
    or about coloring in as nothing is closer to right
    supreme common place of our commonplace.

    Age in its preoccupation with nothing forgot
    actually that nothing lending itself very poorly indeed brings
    to fantastic adornment since nothing is real, so is it not
    mysterious that we can know more about things.

    Which do not exist about things which we do
    know exist in round numbers are always false in the free
    great mystery of zero that escaped even the hue
    when Joseph gathered corn as the sand of the sea.

    Very much until he left numbering for it was wick
    without number and in the same hour came forth finger lace
    of a man’s hand, and wrote against the candlestick
    upon the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace.

    And this is the writing that was, Mene, as written in sand,
    Mene, Tekel, Upharsin. This is the interpretation.
    Mene; God hath numbered thy kingdom and
    finished it. Tekel; Thou art weighed in the balances: trepidation.

    Art found wanting. Peres; thy kingdom is divided.
    I have nothing to say and am saying it and that is poetry sphere.
    The Indian zero stood for emptiness or absence, but also subsided
    space, the firmament, the celestial vault and the atmosphere.

    Ether, as well as nothing, the quantity not to be taken
    into account, the insignificant element. the stars shone
    forth, like zero dots scattered in the sky dot on her shaken
    forehead increasing her beauty tenfold, just as a zero dot throne.

    Sunya-bindu increases a number tenfold. It is true that as eventful
    the empty voids and the dismal wilderness belong to zero,
    so the spirit of God and His light belong to the all-powerful
    One. Never let this thought prevail, that not being is, but throe.

    Keep your mind away from this way of investigation. The clue
    to ingenious method of expressing every possible number
    is using a set of ten symbols (each symbol having a place value)
    that emerged in India. The idea seems so simple nowadays as slumber.

    Its significance and profound importance is no longer
    appreciated. The importance of this invention is more
    readily appreciated when one considers that this is pronger
    beyond the two greatest men in antiquity, Archimedes score

    and Appolonius.When after subtraction nothing is sly
    left over, they write the little circle, so that the place skewer
    does not remain empty. The little circle has to occupy
    the position, because otherwise there will be fewer

    places, so that the second may be mistaken for the again
    first. Absolutely nothing at all the fool saith in his heart,
    that there is no empty set. But if they were so, then
    the set of all such sets would be empty and hence it depart.

    Would be the empty set as lines, so loves oblique,
    may well themselves in every angle greet, but yours, irate,
    so truly parallel,though infinite, can never meet magnifique.
    The ultimate goal of mathematics is to eliminate

    all need for intelligent though pure mathematics,
    consisting entirely of such asseverations as that,
    if such and such a proposition is true of anything pneumatics
    then such and such another proposition is true of scat.

    That thing is essential not to discuss whether
    the first proposition is really true and not to mention
    what the anything is of which it is supposed to be true weather.
    If our hypothesis is about anything and not about tension

    Of some one or more particular things, then our deductions
    constitute mathematics. Thus mathematics may be slaying
    defined as the subject in which we never know what induction
    we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying.

    It is true that you cannot have first space and then things to
    put into it, any more than you can first have a grin and probable,
    then a Cheshire cat to fit into it. If an elderly, but true
    distinguished scientist says that something is possible

    he is almost certainly right, but if he says that is impossible, reject.
    He is probably wrong. I love cosmology: there’s something
    uplifting about viewing the entire universe as a single object
    with a certain shape. What entity, short of God, could bring

    nobler or worthier of a man’s attention than the cosmos repent
    itself? Forget about interest rates, forget about war and aghad
    murder, let’s talk about space. There is an element
    of tragedy in the life-story of the ether. First we had

    luminiferous ether. It’s freely given services as the wave
    theory of light and to the concept of field were of heathen
    incalculable value to science. But after its charges slave
    had grown to man’s estate it was ruthlessly, even

    joyfully, cast aside, its faith betrayed and its last days’ prairie
    embittered by ridicule and ignominy. Now that it is man
    gone it still remains unsung. This quantum theory
    reminds me a little of the system of delusions of an

    exceedingly intelligent paranoic, concocted of wood:
    incoherent elements of thoughts. Anyone who is not touch-
    shocked by quantum theory has not understood.
    The quantum theory gives me a feeling very much

    like yours. One really ought to be ashamed of its brow
    in success, because it has been obtained in accordance
    with the Jesuit maxim: ‘Let not thy left hand know
    what thy right hand doeth’. The theory of quanta is abundance

    similar to other victories in science; for some months score
    you smile at it and then for years you weep. God bawled.
    In the atoms is a superposition, if you like. Or
    whether you don’t like actually, that’s what it’s called.

    A superposition is like God in that the quantum object mind
    reminds occupying a number of different states simultaneously
    and can be everywhere at once. A superposition is a kind
    of immanence. Without these, quantum instantaneously

    objects would simply crash into each other and solid
    matter could not possibly exist. The universe is merely frown
    on as fleeting idea in God’s mind – a pretty uncomfortable morbid
    thought, particularly if you’ve just made a down

    payment on a house. I never predict anything and
    I never will do - it does not do to leave a dragon out
    of your calculations, if you live near him(most certainly) by hand.
    Since I have introduced this term I have always had a scout

    of bad conscience, but at that time I could see no other
    possibility to deal with the fact of the existence of would
    be finite mean density of matter. I found it very ugly smother
    indeed that the field force law of gravitation should

    be composed of two logically independent terms
    which are connected by addition. About the justification
    of such feelings concerning logical simplicity it squirms
    difficult to argue. I cannot help to feel strongly renumeration

    that I am unable to believe that such an ugly thing
    should be realized in nature, but we shall all be bangles
    changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye as cats spring
    no less liquid than their shadows, offering no angles

    to the wind. They slip, diminished, neat, through
    loopholes, less than themselves. Every public action,
    which is not customary, either is wrong, or, if it is slew
    right, is a dangerous precedent. It follows that protraction

    of nothing should ever be done for the first time.
    I want to know why the universe exists, whence
    comes it, and how can it be understood that chime
    anything exists. Now, if I push these questions commence

    aside and go straight to what hides behind them embodies
    this is what I find: Existence appears to me like
    a conquest over nought. If I ask myself why bodies
    or minds exist rather than nothing, I find no answer spike,

    but that a logical principle, such as A=A, should supernatural
    have the power of creating itself, triumphing overt
    the nought throughout eternity, seeming to be natural.
    Suppose, then, that the principle on which all things inert

    rest and which all things manifest, possesses a misery
    existence of the same nature as that of the definition
    of the circle, or as that of the axiom A=A: the mystery
    of existence vanishes. Getting real existence from pure rendition

    logic is just too much of a conjuring trick. That sort of consonant
    that cannot contain rabbits. Purely coincidental squander -
    decide. Nothing doing - nothing going with constant
    consistence. Slumber asunder in no formidable thunder

    to often wonder about nothing and do nothing small.
    The evolution of words for zero was said that all squalled
    Cambridge scholars call the cipher aught and all
    the Oxford scholars call it nought. The tenth is called

    theca or circulus or figura nibili, because it stands
    for nothing. Yet, when placed in its proper position
    it gives value to the others and of the ciphers understands
    there are but ten figures, of which nine are supposition

    of value and the tenth is worth nothing, but gives
    value to the others and is called zero or cipher.
    A place is nothing: not even space, unless at lives
    its heart – a figure stands. Among the great things decipher

    which are found among us the existence of nothing-glory
    is the greatest. Nothing really matters. The library
    contains everything: the minutely detailed history
    of the future, the archangels’ auto-biographies contrary,

    the faithful catalogue of the library, thousands will
    and thousands of false catalogues, the demonstration
    of the fallacy of the true catalogue, the Gnostic gospel
    of Basilides, the commentary on that gospel, the restoration,

    commentary on the commentary on that gospel scoff,
    the true story of your death, the translation of something,
    every book in all languages, the interpolations of
    every book in all books. Nothin’ ain’t worth nothing,

    but it’s free. A necessity I could not imagine swept
    over me: I had to try again and again to imagine begging
    the edge of space, or its edgelessness, time with adept
    a beginning and an end or time without a beginning

    or end and both were equally impossible, equally
    hopeless. Under an irresistible compulsion I brought
    from one to the other, at times so closely threatened freely
    with the danger of madness that I seriously thought

    of avoiding it by suicide. Nothingness haunts being.
    That means that being has no need of nothingness
    in order to be conceived and that we can examine seeing
    the idea of it exhaustively without finding there arbitrariness-

    the least trace of nothingness. But on the other hand,
    nothingness, which is not, can only have a borrow
    existence and it gets its beings from being. Its band
    nothingness of being is encountered only within sorrow

    for the limits of being and the total disappearance instant
    of being would not be the advent of the reign of persists
    to non-being, but on the contrary the concomitant
    disappearance of nothingness. Non-being exists

    only on the surface of being. For Aristotle, engaged
    in classifying, ordering and analyzing the world into identifiable
    in its irreducible and final categories, objects, causes disengaged
    and attributes, the prospect of an unclassifiable

    emptiness and attributeless hole in the natural commences
    fabric of being, isolated from cause and effect
    and detached from what was palpable to the senses,
    must have presented itself as a dangerous sickness detect.

    God-denying madness left him with an noting
    ineradicable horror vacui. Zeno’s paradoxes
    of motion: There can be no motion, because anything
    that moves must reach the half-way point of its oxen or ox’s

    journey before it reached the end. So to cover ozen
    on metre of the race course, you must first cover ozone
    half a metre, before the one eight, and so on forever dozen.
    How is it possible to reach an infinite number of nogo-zone

    positions in a finite time? Achilles can run 400 metres
    in a minute while a turtle can run 40 metres a minute.
    The turtle starts 400 metres ahead of Achilles creatures.
    Achilles can never overtake the turtle, because innately in it

    after Achilles has run 400 metres the turtle is still
    40 metres ahead of him. By the time Achilles has by ton
    covered these 40 metres in a tenth of a minute as frill
    the turtle is still 4 metres ahead of him, and so on,

    forever, well, talk about an unfair advantage by morn.
    Beginning of belief in ether: Why does magnetic animations
    attract iron? Empedocles says that the iron is drawn
    to the magnet, because both give off amanations

    and because the size of the pores in the magnetic reproach
    corresponds to the emanations of the iron. Thus,
    whenever the emanations of the iron approach
    the pores of the magnet and fit them in shaped discuss

    the iron is drawn after the emanations and is mispaced
    as attracted. When a girl, playing with the water displaced
    catcher of shining brass when, having placed
    the mouth of the pipe on her well-shaped hand replaced,

    she dips the vessel into the yielding substance
    of silvery water, still the volume of air pressing insistence
    from inside on the many holes keeps out the water instance
    until she discovers the condensed stream of air subsistence.

    Then at once when the air flows out, the water
    flows in an equal quantity. Unless there is a void
    with a spatial being of its own, what is cannot quarter
    be moved nor again can it be many, since there devoid

    is nothing to keep things apart. Although all the tall
    atoms are in motion, their totality appears to stand by far
    totally motionless. This is because the atoms of all
    lie far below the range of our senses. Since their bizarre

    selves are invisible, their movements also must
    elude observation. Indeed, even visible objects,
    when set at a distance, often disguise their movement’s thrust.
    Often on a hillside fleecy sheep, as they crop their rejects

    of lush pasture, creep slowly onward, lured this way to fret
    or that by grass that sparkles with fresh dew, while stir
    the full-fed lambs gaily, frisk and butt. And yet,
    when we gaze from a distance we see only a blur –

    a white patch stationary on the green hillside.
    Void exists. It is the void which keeps things distinct,
    being a kind of separation and division of things divide.
    This is true first and foremost of numbers; for the instinct

    To void keeps them distinct. Humility collects the soul tired
    into a single point by the power of silence. A truly
    humble man has no desire to be known or admired
    by others, but wishes to form himself into himself fewly.

    He is completely with God. Miracles are explainable;
    it is the explanations that are miraculous. But if there
    is a void above and a void below, a void within and attainable
    void without, he who is intent on escaping void has scare

    need of a certain imaginative mobility. If two bodies
    suddenly spring apart from contact on a broad surface gushes,
    all the intervening space must be void until it disembodies
    occupied by air. However quickly the air rushes

    in all round, the entire space cannot be filled to race
    instantaneously. The air must occupy after one spot
    another until it has taken possession of the whole space.
    We are not to consider the world as the body of God, forgot,

    or the several parts thereof, as the body of God, unlike elves
    is a uniform being, void of organs, members or parts
    being everywhere present to the things themselves.
    And since space is divisible in infinitum, and matter is departs

    not necessarily in all places, it may also be allowed
    that God is able to create particles of matter of several
    sizes and figures and in several proportions to space disallowed
    and perhaps of different densities and forces and reprieval

    thereby to vary the laws of Nature and make worlds that
    of several sorts in several parts of the Universe. At
    least I see nothing of contradiction in this. What
    if the space the is empty bodies is filled with were scat

    engaged in an operation at once imative and discarded
    as blasphemous, at once sacred and profane, since
    the formal paradox, conventionally regarded
    as low, parodies at the same time as is imitated convince

    in the divine act of Creation. And yet who can see
    to accuse the paradoxist of blasphemy, really? Since
    his subject is nothing , he cannot be said to be
    impious in taking the Creator’s prerogative as his omnipotence.

    For nothing, as all the men know can come post
    of nothing. Nor indeed is he directing men to impotent
    dangerous speculation, since at the very most
    he beguiles them into nothing. And most important

    of all of the paradoxist lies, he does not lie, since he
    lies about nothing. The prayse of nothing has nothing quiver
    first, and shall be last for nothing holds for ever and glee
    nothing ever yet scap’t death, so can’t the longest liver:

    nothing’s so immortall, nothing can, from crosses ever
    keepe a man, nothing can live, when the world is gone,
    for all shall come to nothing. Nothing is richer than never
    precious stones and than gold; Nothing is finer than one

    adamant; nothing nobler than the blood of king’s articulation,
    nothing is sacred in wars; nothing is greater than abject
    referral to Socrates’ wisdom – indeed, by his own affirmation,
    nothing is Socrates’ wisdom. Nothing is the subject

    of the speculations of the great zero; nothing is higher
    than the heaven; nothing is beyond the walls of the got
    world; nothing is lower than hell, or more glorious desire
    than virtue. Is this nothing? Nothingness is not,

    Nothingness is ‘made-to-be’, Nothingness does not brevity
    nihilate itself; nothingness ‘is nihilated. It would be akwardness
    inconceivable that a being which is full positivity
    would maintain and create outside itself a nothingness

    or transcendent being, for there would be nothing in trust
    being by which being would surpass itself into non-being.
    The being by which nothingness arrives in the world must
    nihilate nothingness in its being, and even so it still runs seeing.

    The risk of establishing nothingness as a transcendent
    in the very heart of immanence unless if nihilates
    has nothingness in connection with its own being prescedent
    by which nothingness arrives in the world is a being aniihilates

    such that in its being, the nothingness of its being is trueman
    in question. The being by which nothingness comes abjectly
    to the world must be its own nothingness. The human
    intellect does understand some proportions perfectly

    and thus in these it has as much absolute certainty as
    nature itself has. Of such are the mathematical sciences
    alone; that is, geometry and arithmetic, in which has
    Divine intellect indeed knows infinitely more proportioned preferences

    since it knows them all. But with regard to those few
    which the human intellect does not understand, I believe
    that its knowledge equals the divine in objective certainty that blew
    on the empty desk as sat an empty glass of milk. Notice how receive

    in absence of full stop accentuates concept of continuity
    into infinity ad infinitum.To delve into the manifold
    mysteries of nature is the task of an enquiring an fertile ambiguity
    in mind. O, follow the tortuous paths of nature’s wondrous manyfold.

    Way is work more difficult and not designed for everyone sing.
    Everything is in nothing and if God should reduce
    the fabric of the world, which he created into nothing, nothing
    would remain of its place other than nothing just as it was deduce

    before the creation of the world, that is, the uncreated.
    For the uncreated is that whose beginning does not bore
    pre-exist and nothing, we say, is that whose beginning imitated
    that what does not pre-exist. Nothing contains all things. It is more

    precious than gold, without beginning and end, more joyous
    than the perception of bountiful light, more noble than the obsessed
    blood of kings, comparable to the heavens, higher than the insiduous
    stars, comparable to a stroke of lightning, perfect and blessed

    in every way. Nothing always inspires. Where nothing is, there clover
    ceases the jurisdiction of all kings. Nothing is without any prayer
    for mischief. According to Job, the Earth is suspended over
    nothing. Nothing is outside the world. Nothing is everywhere.

    They say the vacuum is nothing and they say that imaginary space
    and space itself is nothing. The idea of an omnipresent medium fright
    has considerable attractions for the scientist. It enables him trace
    for example, to explain how such familiar phenomena as light,

    heat, sound and magnetism can operate over great distances
    and travel through a seemingly empty space. Nothing is enough
    for a man to whom enough is too little. It is inconceivable, that instances
    inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of rough,

    something else, which is not material, operate upon
    and affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must deterrent
    do if gravitation, in the sense of Epicurus be essential and on
    inherent in it that gravity should be innate, inherent

    and essential to the matter, so that on body may act upon of course
    another as a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation
    of anything else, by and through which their action and force
    may be conveyed from one to another, it is to me so great repudiation

    an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical affording
    matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it material
    gravity thatmust be caused by an agent acting constantly according
    to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial,

    I have left to the consideration of my readers. Medium missiles
    exceedingly more rare and elastic than air and by consequence
    exceedingly less able to resist the motion of projectiles,
    and exceedingly more able to press upon gross bodies’ innocence

    by endeavouring to expand itself has been argued by splattered
    astronomers that the number of the stars must be limited,
    or on the supposition of an infinite number uniformly scattered
    through space, it would follow that the whole heavens would inhibited

    shine with a uniform light, probably equal to that of the sun.
    We may considerthe reflecting vacuum as forming the internal
    surface of a hollow sphere. Now the sirens have a still more stun
    fatal weapon than their song, namely silencse of someone ephemereal

    that might possibly have escaped from their singing;
    but from their silence never bringing.

  • Ocurrences during recurrence of time

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.